home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
NetNews Offline 2
/
NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso
/
news
/
comp
/
std
/
c
/
588
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1996-08-06
|
985b
Path: sdrc.com!thor!scjones
From: larry.jones@sdrc.com (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Bit-field sizes
Date: 17 Mar 1996 20:09:37 GMT
Organization: SDRC Engineering Services
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4ihri1$4qk@info1.sdrc.com>
References: <nzRPxQ9ytZZA084yn@csn.net> <4hkgds$bbh@info1.sdrc.com> <827022001snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.sdrc.com
Originator: scjones@thor
In article <827022001snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>, Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk> writes:
> This results in undefined behaviour due to the long type of the declarator.
> However a constraint is also violated due to the field width. Is a diagnostic
> still required in this case or can the compiler omit it as a form of undefined
> behaviour?
That question was asked in an early Defect Report; the diagnostic is
still required.
----
Larry Jones, SDRC, 2000 Eastman Dr., Milford, OH 45150-2789 513-576-2070
larry.jones@sdrc.com
Oh yeah? You just wait! -- Calvin